Re: Relative URI references

[Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> It is the possibility of ids being in schemes like
> HTTP that would 
> introduce the possibility of scheme specific URI
> comparisons, not the 
> ability for URIs to be expressed as being relative
> to xml:base.

If the consensus is that HTTP URLs should be allowed
for IDs then relative URIs should be banned. If a
specific URI scheme is mandated then it should be one
that doesn't have a relative URI scheme. Either way
relative URIs for IDs are a bad idea. 


=====
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #25
No matter how well it would perform, I will never construct any sort of machinery which is completely indestructible except for one small and virtually inaccessible vulnerable spot.


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail