[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Relative URI references

To: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Relative URI references
From: Toru Marumoto <torumyax@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 02:26:53 +0900
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


>
>My Universal Feed Parser [1] supports relative URIs correctly.  That
>plus BottomFeeder gives us two independent implementations, which
>counts as rough consensus and running code.  

Actually, I just tested in BottomFeeder. I see it's having some problem handling relative
URIs. When I try to navigate to the original page, a dialog shows up; "No Link Provided".
I tested other atom feeds that uses abusolute URIs, and there was no problem.

I just don't see any benefits of using relative URIs in atom:link. IMHO, of cource.



Toru Marumoto
     see you on the web!
________________________________

--------------------------------

__________________________________________________
GANBARE! NIPPON!
Yahoo! JAPAN JOC OFFICIAL INTERNET PORTAL SITE
http://mail.ganbare-nippon.yahoo.co.jp/

References:
- Re: Relative URI references
  - From: Mark Pilgrim

Prev by Date: Re: PaceFeedEquivalence
Next by Date: Re: PaceDates
Previous by thread: Re: Relative URI references
Next by thread: Re: Relative URI references
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread