[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OK, enough with atom:id

To: "Tim Bray" <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OK, enough with atom:id
From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:51:07 +0200
Cc: Atom-Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3865)

On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:00:22 -0700, Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To our editors: please feel free to go ahead and roll in the consensus
language.

What is the «consensus language», exactly?

Sam, there might be a few Paces on the issues list that can now be
closed?

Which ones are those? (Just wondering.)

--
Asbjørn Ulsberg         -=|=-        asbjornu@xxxxxxxxxxx
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»

Follow-Ups:
- MORATORIUM: Re: OK, enough with atom:id
  - From: Paul Hoffman / IMC

References:
- OK, enough with atom:id
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: A simpler proposal: PaceAtomIDAsString
Next by Date: Re: OK, enough with atom:id
Previous by thread: Re: OK, enough with atom:id
Next by thread: MORATORIUM: Re: OK, enough with atom:id
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread