Re: Atom-FOAF

[Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have now fixed these two further bugs. Thanks for the feedback.

Still looking forward to more of the same medicine :-)

Henry

On 15 Aug 2004, at 22:27, Sam Ruby wrote:

> Henry Story wrote:
>
> > > 2) Why is :data an declared as "^^rdf:XMLLiteral"?
> > I thought that since the value of the data field of a content object 
> > would most likely be xml, this would probably be the best type to 
> > give it. But I am fully open to criticism here.
>
> In general, text/html is a xsd:string.  application/xhtml+xml is xml.

I would like at a later stage to rewrite my blog in xhtml. But for the 
moment it is
in html, so I'll use xsd:string.

I suppose that if one uses application/xhtml+xml and one wants to 
insert xml fragments,
these always have to be wrapped in a top level tag such as 
<div>...</div>

I need to fix the OWL file to make the data field be either xsd:string 
or rdf:XMLLiteral. Currently this is not possible to do in Protege, so 
I'll wait for a point when I am confident enough to write OWL files by 
hand to add that.

> > > 3) Why does :created have " GMT" in it?  I believe this makes it an
> > >    invalid xsd:dateTime value.
> > That's because I must have copied and pasted my Java date creation 
> > time from a flawed source.
> > I have now changed it to:
> >       df = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"); //ISO 8601 
> > format
>
> Other than four extra characters being present in your original source 
> (" GMT"), the previous version was preferred as it included a timezone 
> offset.
>
> - Sam Ruby