[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely

To: James Robertson <jarober@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:52:25 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 7:57 PM -0400 8/17/04, James Robertson wrote:

As a content producer, what advantage would there be in switching to Atom 1.0?

When we get close to finishing, we'll have a better answer. For now, there is nothing we can say definitively because we don't know what the final specs will look like.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
  - From: James Robertson

References:
- Shipping Atom products prematurely
  - From: Mark Nottingham
- Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
  - From: James Robertson

Prev by Date: Re: atomenabled.org
Next by Date: Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
Previous by thread: Re: Motivating Content Producers
Next by thread: Re: Shipping Atom products prematurely
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread