Re: ID wording

[Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>]

On Aug 18, 2004, at 11:49 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Ah. Can we agree to add this to the list;
>
> - If/when Atom is described with XML Schema, the ID should be a 
> xs:string, not xs:anyURI. I.e., the content will be restricted to a 
> URI in prose, not in the schema.

I'm nervous about getting that specific... this feels like it belongs 
in an Implementor's Guide or some such.  I think we have agreement that 
we should provide schemas to help out (although not that they be 
normative), and a well-commented entry in such a schema seems like a 
good way to do it. -Tim