[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceWSDL

To: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PaceWSDL
From: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:39:00 -0400
Cc: Atom WG <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803

Dare Obasanjo wrote:

Quite frankly, lots of people are going to create WSDLs for the Atom API (lots already have) and in the interest of interop I'd rather see them using the same WSDL that different ones which will all be slightly incompatible.

What should be included in the spec? WSDL 1.1? WSDL 2.0? Both?

- Sam Ruby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PaceWSDL
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

References:
- Re: PaceWSDL
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: Transporting Atom Notifications over the XMPP (was: updates and deletes)
Next by Date: Re: Can atom be Del.icio.us? Or, can Del.icio.us be atomic?
Previous by thread: Re: PaceWSDL
Next by thread: Re: PaceWSDL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread