[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: High volume feeds - one possible solution

To: bob@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: High volume feeds - one possible solution
From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:04:26 +0200
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Reply-to: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:43:02 -0400, Bob Wyman <bob@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         If you're going to increase the complexity of the server software in
> this manner, why [not] just go the tiny further step of supporting RFC3229...

A better answer occurred to me -  what I described at the start of
this thread will work with the existing Atom specifications. No spec
extensions needed.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 

http://dannyayers.com

References:
- High volume feeds - one possible solution
  - From: Danny Ayers
- RE: High volume feeds - one possible solution
  - From: Bob Wyman

Prev by Date: Re: High volume feeds - one possible solution
Next by Date: RE: High volume feeds - one possible solution
Previous by thread: RE: High volume feeds - one possible solution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread