[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ARMCHAIR LAWYER ALERT (was: Re: Atom's dates may have legal implications... At least one "objective date" should be supported.)

On 26 Sep 2004, at 3:03 am, jt wrote:

My recollection of the charter was it was worded rather generally. You
saying it, the charter, specifically precluded Atom documents from being
legally admissable...?!? Or was this issue even contemplated when the
charter was drawn up?

I'm saying it's not and never has been a consideration. If Bob wants it to be a consideration he has to argue for that first before he can start discussing changes that need to be made.

My proposed squirrels requirement was entirely serious.

Graham

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature