[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceLinkPurpose

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PaceLinkPurpose
From: Graham <dtcd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:30:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I like it but don't think it goes far enough, or that its wording is viable (clicakable/not-clickable is not a valid axis). There are basically 4 types of link:

alternate - special case
related - related, via, etc
service
image - favicons and logos

We already have a special element for service (don't we?). The next step is to break out all the other types and drop the generic <link> element completely.

Graham

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PaceLinkPurpose
  - From: Antone Roundy
- Re: PaceLinkPurpose
  - From: Danny Ayers

References:
- PaceLinkPurpose
  - From: Dare Obasanjo

Prev by Date: PaceLinkDelicious
Next by Date: Re: PaceLinkPurpose
Previous by thread: Re: PaceLinkPurpose
Next by thread: Re: PaceLinkPurpose
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread