[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceLinkDelicious

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PaceLinkDelicious
From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 12:32:20 +1000
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.1.2418

On 9/10/04 4:28 AM, "Danny Ayers" <danny.ayers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +0.
> 
> This is simply more evidence that an extensible relationship operator is
> needed.

-1

This is just PaceLinkAttrDefaults with 'about' added as a choice. Will we be
seeing more paces asking for more individual @rels to add to
PaceLinkAttrDefaults until once again we have a long list, only to then see
PaceLinkAttrDefaults2 reduce it again ? No thanks.

e.

References:
- PaceLinkDelicious
  - From: Danny Ayers

Prev by Date: Re: PaceLinkRelMechanism
Next by Date: Re: PaceLinkPurpose
Previous by thread: PaceLinkDelicious
Next by thread: PaceLinkParent
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread