New AtomPubIssuesList for 2004/11/15

[Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Keeping it simple, lets focus on two things.

First, lets take PaceHeadInEntry, which a number of people have 
indicated that they want either this or something like it before the 
format can be declared done.

Second, lets see if we can significantly reduce the number of 
alternative syntaxes being considered for link.  For starters, I'm 
taking Tim's request (as echoed by Rob) that link related Paces which 
have not been updated recently be recommended for closure.

Even with this done, this would have been eight retired Link related 
paces, and eight new Link related Paces.  However, with Danny retiring 
two in favor of PaceFieldingLinks (thanks, Danny!), this shifts the 
balance to ten retired and six under active consideration.

I'd like to reiterate my request that for the ones that we don't come to 
consensus on this time, we don't simply put these back in the queue.

Effectively this means that if somebody objects to a pace, one of three 
things happens:

 (1) the person agrees to work on fixing the issues that they have
     identified, and the issue goes back on the queue with this
     understanding.

 (2) the chairs note the objection, but finds that there is enough
     support for the proposal to declare rough consensus, and the
     proposal gets accepted.

 (3) the pace gets rejected.

- Sam Ruby