Re: To RDF or not to RDF, that is the (perennial) question

[David Powell <djpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thursday, January 6, 2005, 5:43:36 PM, you wrote:

> [1] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg11850.html
>      I later found ways around most (all?) of the problems I had 
> identified in that mail on the atom-owl mailing list.

Just a minor point on that email:

> - an owl file could specify that atom:href is a subproperty of rdf:resource, and so
> alloow us to replace rdf:resource with atom:href

"rdf:resource" is a syntactic element of RDF/XML, not anything that
appears in an RDF model, so I wouldn't have thought that an OWL file
could do syntactic tricks like this?

-- 
Dave