Re: Enclosure count

To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Enclosure count
From: David Jacobs <djacobs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:59:49 -0500
Cc: Atom WG <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gH6sXGza/KUqTtPZW3zb981TbNJMq8j8Ue4Uyg7l5onTaHaPh3WvP5l3TQjFNP1gCwUEAoYRMdYa39AdP9mlG65ssFyLPugRXy82WEySF+dj5Ptyc5giCx/SKeqAlQ0GiZoZtOkMvpFTjAi1UzzxYg8V4DgBjpvIwT3+dgHa5Lk=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: David Jacobs <djacobs@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

RSS 2.0 DOES have a one enclosure per entry restriction, so we're
breaking RSS2 compatibility. Why wouldn't multiple enclosures be
multiple posts?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enclosure count
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: Enclosure count
  - From: Antone Roundy