[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AtomOWL & AtomIsRDF

To: Dan Brickley <danbri@xxxxxx>, Henry Story <henry.story@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AtomOWL & AtomIsRDF
From: Walter Underwood <wunder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:52:36 -0800
Cc: "'Atom WG'" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--On Monday, January 17, 2005 12:16:36 PM -0500 Dan Brickley <danbri@xxxxxx> wrote:


I fear [2] is unfortunately named. Atom is RDF-like in some ways,
but until the Atom spec says "Atom is RDF", Atom isn't RDF.

Call it "AtomAsRDF".

wunder
--
Walter Underwood
Principal Architect
Verity Ultraseek

References:
- AtomOWL & AtomIsRDF
  - From: Henry Story
- Re: AtomOWL & AtomIsRDF
  - From: Dan Brickley

Prev by Date: Re: Posted PaceSimpleLanguageTagging
Next by Date: Re: Posted PaceSimpleLanguageTagging
Previous by thread: Re: AtomOWL & AtomIsRDF
Next by thread: Content datatypes in XSD?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread