[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multiple content allowed?

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Multiple content allowed?
From: Bill de hÓra <bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:15:38 +0000
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

Norman Walsh wrote:

Someone sent me this, noting that it was not valid according to the
grammar I posted. He thought it was legal according to the spec,
and I'm not sure. What say you?

My first thought is that unless there a use-case for multiple content blocks, you've found a bug in the spec.

cheers
Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiple content allowed?
  - From: Robert Sayre

References:
- Multiple content allowed?
  - From: Norman Walsh

Prev by Date: Re: PaceAttributesNamespace is *not* about syntax!
Next by Date: Re: Multiple content allowed?
Previous by thread: Multiple content allowed?
Next by thread: Re: Multiple content allowed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread