[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Posted PaceTextRules

To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Posted PaceTextRules
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 18:09:49 +0900
Cc: atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


At 00:38 05/02/01, Tim Bray wrote:
>
>
>On Jan 31, 2005, at 5:37 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#xmlspace cites a quite different >> opinion on this matter... > >Yes, well that opinion is (a) specific to HTML and (b) wrong. I'm amazed that the W3C allowed that to be published. -Tim

Would you mind explaining why you think it's wrong?

Regards, Martin.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

References:
- Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Graham
- Re: Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Posted PaceTextRules
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: Posted PaceTextRules
Next by Date: Re: Work Queue Rotation #16
Previous by thread: Re: Posted PaceTextRules
Next by thread: Re: Posted PaceTextRules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread