This specification assigns no significance to the order of atom:entry
elements within an Atom Feed Document. Atom Processors MAY present
entries in any order, unless a specific ordering is required by an
extension.
(I.e., I could come up with the UseLexicalOrdering extension, and
require processors to understand it to use the feed, assuming our
extensibility model supports that, which I very much hope it will).
Seem reasonable?
On Feb 2, 2005, at 4:18 PM, David Powell wrote:
This specification assigns no significance to the order of
atom:entry elements within the feed. Processors MAY present entries in
a different order to which they are appear in an Atom Feed Document.