[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
To
: Robert Sayre <
sayrer@xxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From
: Graham <
dtcd@xxxxxxx
>
Date
: Fri, 6 May 2005 04:45:47 +0100
Cc
: atom-syntax <
atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
>
In-reply-to
: <
>
List-archive
: <
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/
>
List-id
: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
>
References
: <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
> <
>
Sender
:
owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 6 May 2005, at 4:26 am, Robert Sayre wrote:
PaceTextShouldBeProvided: SHOULD have a summary PaceOptionalSummary: MAY have a summary
No, Robert:
Current situation: MUST have a summary
PaceOptionalSummary: No explicit opinion
PaceTextShouldBeProvided: SHOULD have a summary
PaceOptionalSummary simply says remove the "MUST", it doesn't say what it should be replaced with.
Graham
Follow-Ups
:
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Robert Sayre
References
:
PaceTextShouldBeProvided
From:
Antone Roundy
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided
From:
Sam Ruby
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided
From:
Robert Sayre
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided
From:
Graham
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided
From:
Robert Sayre
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Tim Bray
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Robert Sayre
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Tim Bray
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Robert Sayre
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Sam Ruby
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
From:
Robert Sayre
Prev by Date:
Autodiscovery discussion & editorship
Next by Date:
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
Previous by thread:
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
Next by thread:
Re: PaceTextShouldBeProvided vs PaceOptionalSummary
Index(es):
Date
Thread