[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Autodiscovery discussion & editorship

To: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Autodiscovery discussion & editorship
From: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 08:43:39 -0500
Cc: atom-syntax Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aPBH2LbRfbiLbEMdATwqcAZ7ZtaVE2UrK7Dm/47D0TDGhQy7gAtvuovPxO7Su4BUtvXykK92gvFwaxzqtzmMcxw4PJFlNww49SjYKn/8ptVUQUaP43T2LtCYQ+ZbwcrITs7JnaheV/jqNSOEpGzxbOrvodE98YAv+yjXAGB/5wM=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Reply-to: Mark Pilgrim <pilgrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 5/5/05, Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The discussion in recent days has been lively but unstructured.  If I
> were forced to make a consensus call right now, I'm pretty sure I
> wouldn't be able to pick out any one spec change that I could say
> clearly has consensus.

The one suggestion I did see, which should be acted on immediately, is
to update the references section to point to the newest versions of
the XML and URI specs (and associated link changes throughout the
text).

-- 
Cheers,
-Mark

References:
- Autodiscovery discussion & editorship
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Re: PaceAllowDuplicateIDs
Next by Date: Atom Implementation Guide: seeking co-editor
Previous by thread: Autodiscovery discussion & editorship
Next by thread: Atom Implementation Guide: seeking co-editor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread