[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes

To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes
From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 22:34:53 -0400
Cc: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rvMNvln/nPc6Bz2f39+9Z8AkqcNgA0xNPwQ5hoFnICsTBBWafoWfowzvvI77xgIzCYd+2lgTZ+u7LMPbeGQTsr6z14dOpyaUwiqXSxsbfFtKM80hrABFyqVYehCyH9vTKg+zb+KA2W6RHWD/lzzIlGO67nWMpfgGzPsm2HSIWyE=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Reply-to: Robert Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 5/9/05, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wonder if there's some standard IETF practice when you define a
> language as regards future change control?
> 
> Generally -1.  This spec defines what Atom 1.0 is, why try to
> micro-manage the future? 

Fair enough. But can just anyone add stuff to the Atom namespace? 

Robert Sayre

References:
- extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: Atom 1.0?
Next by Date: Autodiscovery paces
Previous by thread: Re: extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes
Next by thread: Re: extensions -- Atom NS and unprefixed attributes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread