[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Atom 1.0?

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Atom 1.0?
From: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:12:09 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

At 9:09 PM -0700 5/9/05, Walter Underwood wrote:

Seriously, I don't mind "Atom 1.0" as long as the next version is
"Atom 2.0".

+12

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Atom 1.0?
  - From: Walter Underwood

References:
- Atom 1.0?
  - From: Tim Bray
- Re: Atom 1.0?
  - From: Walter Underwood

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: 'The Atom Syndication Format' to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Autodiscovery paces
Previous by thread: Re: Atom 1.0?
Next by thread: Re: Atom 1.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread