[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Autodiscovery paces

To: Nikolas Coukouma <lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Autodiscovery paces
From: Graham <dtcd@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 17:24:58 +0100
Cc: atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 10 May 2005, at 3:38 am, Nikolas Coukouma wrote:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAnchorSupport

-1

I also don't want to implement it.

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDifferentRelValue

-1

I mainly don't see the point of changing it. Also, while "alternate" expressly says the feed corresponds in some way to the content of the current page, "feed" simply says "here is a feed of some kind", and isn't a relationship at all.

Graham

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Autodiscovery paces
  - From: Eric Scheid

References:
- Autodiscovery paces
  - From: Nikolas Coukouma

Prev by Date: Re: Atom 1.0?
Next by Date: Re: PaceOptionalSummary
Previous by thread: Re: Autodiscovery paces
Next by thread: Re: Autodiscovery paces
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread