[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Atomic age

To: Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: The Atomic age
From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:32:29 +0200
Cc: Atom WG <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3)

Quoting Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Paul assures me that the remaining IETF process steps will not introduce material technical changes, and so format-10 is appropriate as a basis for implementors to go to work. So, implementors... to work. And everyone, now is a good time to tell the world. -Tim

Yay!

(Except for the namespace that is. Ouch!)


--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Atomic age
  - From: Asbjørn Ulsberg

References:
- The Atomic age
  - From: Tim Bray

Prev by Date: The Atomic age
Next by Date: Re: The Atomic age
Previous by thread: The Atomic age
Next by thread: Re: The Atomic age
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread