[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Atomic age
- To: Atom WG <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: The Atomic age
- From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:39:41 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l2zn9Ff0O8sMfs+J27hEmdQBJy3zAR2QDdRUREJQQTi2cJ/P1t88L/eXsXjonv1JewE5k8W9idVEyN7XHJWuBtY62trYgfJ+ZHng6Mie4r15XLGpFLm4P5lkhhHyyLrs6jVH3jSM+AkyqkxyKW0BB4+GzUlEp3PRvAk5elPWupg=
- In-reply-to: <>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <>
- Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Congrats All!
I'll be updating my personal blog feed to Atom 1.0 shortly. I've
already updated my IBM internal blog feed to Atom 1.0. Took less than
five minutes to update from 0.3 to 1.0.
Tim Bray wrote:
Paul assures me that the remaining IETF process steps will not
introduce material technical changes, and so format-10 is appropriate
as a basis for implementors to go to work. So, implementors... to
work. And everyone, now is a good time to tell the world. -Tim