Re: The Atomic age

[Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 15, 2005, at 12:35 PM, Robert Sayre wrote:

> http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F% 
> 2Fwww.fondantfancies.com%2Fblog%2Fatom1%2F

Hmm... the feed looks OK to me; I wouldn't be surprised if it's  
tickling a bug in the just-barely-into-beta Atom 1.0 feedvalidator  
code. -Tim


> :)
>
> Robert Sayre
>
> On 7/15/05, Graham <dtcd@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:56 pm, Walter Underwood wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Do we have a list of who is implementing it? That could be used in
> > > the "Deployment" section of <http://www.tbray.org/atom/RSS-and- 
> > > Atom>.
> >
> > My blog has one here:
> > http://www.fondantfancies.com/blog/atom1/
> >
> > I think it's valid, though it's hard to tell without a validator or
> > even a parser. I'm currently rewriting the engine of Shrook to be
> > compatible too.
> >
> > (You may also notice I'm doing my little bit to make sure atom:id is
> > implemented properly)
> >
> > Graham Parks