[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments Draft
On 31/7/05 7:47 AM, "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Iım -1 on using ³replies-source²; I should have said so more
> explicitly before. To me it is non-sensical, as it parses as ³the
> source of replies,² which is the opposite relationship of what
> itıs supposed to express. Itıs not where the replies come from,
> itıs where the entries being replied to come from.
replies-referent then? (ie. the target of a reference)
e.