[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!

To: Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:26:59 -0400
Cc: bobwyman@xxxxxxxxxx, Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NGh6MuDpTFqRgWzlvO54nFD4xf0fdGfRzO+1bw7w+2GHX7VNMHRfdWbdLDp+S5/P1MyFNZaR2SKlwrDdeIz6R4baqoXT/51unmRzhVFI3w09qE6pkk0e5fgRsVXQTS9aTpjtw6TnQIRk4bW+CRi9TcVhW5ABOx8SI+wrEzn4qM4=
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 8/22/05, Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joe Gregorio wrote:
> > Why not POST the Atom Entry, ala the Atom Publishing Protocol?
> 
> Essentially, LiveJournal is making this data available to anybody who
> wishes to access it, without any need to register or to invent a unique API.

Ahh, I had thought this was a more dedicated ping traffic stream. The 
never ending Atom document makes much more sense now.

  Thanks,
   -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Tim Bray

References:
- If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Joe Gregorio
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Sam Ruby

Prev by Date: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Next by Date: Re: Extensions at the feed level (Was: Re: geolocation in atom:author?)
Previous by thread: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Next by thread: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread