[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
From: Walter Underwood <wunder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:33:32 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--On August 22, 2005 2:01:45 PM -0400 Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Interestingly enough the FF separated entries method would also work 
> when storing a large quantity of entries in a single flat file where
> appending an entry needs to be fast.

The original application was logfiles in XML.

wunder
--
Walter Underwood
Principal Software Architect, Verity

References:
- If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Bob Wyman
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Walter Underwood
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: A. Pagaltzis
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: James M Snell
- Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
  - From: Joe Gregorio

Prev by Date: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Previous by thread: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Next by thread: Re: If you want "Fat Pings" just use Atom!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread