[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unofficial last call on draft-snell-atompub-feed-expires-04.txt
I know the Atom working group seemed to be against reusing dublin core in
the core Atom spec, but since this is an extension, were dcterms:valid
and/or dcterms:available ever considered as alternatives? From my
understanding they appear to be describing essentially the same thing.
I don't particularly like the whole DCMI Period structure they're using, but
since it's an existing format, any aggregator author that wishes to support
this sort of thing is probably going to be supporting it anyway. Adding
another extension that does essentially the same thing just gives them more
work to do.
Or have I complete misunderstood the intended use?
James M Snell wrote:
Summary: introduces a mechanism for specifying a date-time or maximum age
for the informational content of a feed or entry