Re: New Link Relations? [was: Feed History -04]

[Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>]

Requiring a separate element to always be present is a non-starter;  
what is the point of a "reusable" link relation if you have to use it  
with another element to contextualise it? I'm really stretching to  
see any benefit from this approach.

prev-archive (or maybe prev-entries?) is starting to look better, as  
is <fh:prev/>.


On 17/10/2005, at 9:17 PM, James M Snell wrote:

> In other words,
>
> this does not imply a feed history thing...
>  <feed>
>    ...
>    <link rel="next" href="..." />
>  </feed>
>
> this does...
>  <feed>
>    ...
>    <fh:incremental>true</fh:incremental>
>    <link rel="next" href="..." />
>  </feed>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/