[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?

To: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
From: "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 04:09:19 +0200
In-reply-to: <BAY106-DAV17B7C20AB62CA1A98B2FE4BECA0@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
References: <20060402104919.yjh11vu6nugwgwsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY106-DAV17B7C20AB62CA1A98B2FE4BECA0@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

* James Holderness <j4_james@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-04-04 03:25]:
> The way I see it, until a standards body tells us otherwise, we
> are obliged to support the Content-Location header unless we
> can provide a very good argument for ignoring it.

+1, standards aren’t there for people to cherry-pick the parts
they find convenient or useful.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
  - From: Anne van Kesteren

References:
- Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
  - From: Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
  - From: James Holderness

Prev by Date: Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
Next by Date: Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
Previous by thread: Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
Next by thread: Re: Does xml:base apply to type="html" content?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread