Quoting James Holderness <j4_james@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
I think the issue of neutral link bookmarking is unlikely to be a
problem for Atom aggregators though. Server bugs are another thing,
but I think most feeds will be broken without an explicit xml:base
anyway, so maybe that's not worth worrying about. I'm not sure though.
Should the WG recommend ignoring Content-Location as a base URI, or
should aggregators follow the RFC exactly as specified?
If `Content-Location` is not usable or can't be used consistent on a
website
(for example, using it for both Atom and HTML content) I suggest we specify
something that is consistent with what browsers do. And perhaps try to
obsolete
the relevant header if possible...