[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

To: "Atom WG" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
From: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 20:35:21 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kiqDPV6Kk8xWPlYELPKWhVgH99Z5IiBYZZcYaa3//OewNBfnGZ1W7Xb78cdPn8vxsA/gPlavf0G4fG9S4Fg9Kp4YwZUspkMz4TO4v7gnEK8ZpCQ6GQk3h5QuvFnsUDTn8+Ul7AJO2CnB6Qvr6N0MJLcexCewYCXoDw3XMBf9GhE=
In-reply-to: <p06230961c0c628c12786@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <p06230961c0c628c12786@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On 6/26/06, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


Working Group Summary

This is not a WG draft.  Nevertheless, the AtomPub WG discussion on this draft
was fairly lengthy, and resulted in a number of changes to the draft.


Who wrote this summary? Even Paul went on the record saying there was
no consensus on several aspects of the document. This summary makes it
sound like it underwent a number of friendly suggestions, rather than
disapproval by at least half of the commenters, interupted only by
incorrect readings of RFC2026 and obfuscation by the document author.

--

Robert Sayre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Paul Hoffman

Prev by Date: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread