Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-09.txt

[James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, reading it again I think you're right, either way, however, the
construction of the sentence looks odd. Shortening it up to use your
wording below would likely be better:

   The response to a POST request containing an Atom Entry Document
   SHOULD contain a Content-Location header that contains the same
   character-by-character value as the Location header.

- James

Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
> James,
> 
>> First minor nit:
>>
>> Section 8.1:
>>
>>    When the POST request contains an Atom Entry Document, ...
>>
>> that should read "POST response" and not "POST request"
> 
> I think you make a mistake. POST request is the correct wording here...
> well it is my understanding.
> 
> But if you are correct one should read, "a response to a POST request" not
> "POST response".
> 
> - Sylvain
> 
>