Andreas Sewe wrote:
Well, the subject says it all; here they are:- It were nice if the example in 7.1 would include @xml:lang, since both workspace/@title and collection/@title are Language-Sensitive. Granted, there might be a Content-Language response header (not shown) to do the job, but IMHO the example would benefit from making language information explicit.
+1.Which are clients supposed to respect in a conflict, the Content-Language header or the xml:lang, ie, does XML On The Web Failing Miserably, Utterly, And Completely extend to Content-Language+xml:lang?
- The proposed file extension for APP Introspection Documents (.atomsrv) and its media type (application/atomserv+xml) are inconsistent. It would IMHO be better to use either "atomsrv" or "atomserv" consistently in both file extension and media type. Everything else is just confusing for no good reason.
I have no strong prefs here (other than liking "application/app+xml"). cheers Bill