[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard

To: "Robert Sayre" <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:18:42 -0400
Cc: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Paul Hoffman" <phoffman@xxxxxxx>, "Atom WG" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <68fba5c50607181643r137efdd4wd84c887942d743c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Robert Sayre's message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:43:36 -0400")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <p06230961c0c628c12786@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <68fba5c50606261735x478e1311s335e041fda54a298@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p06230963c0c6330a9098@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <68fba5c50606261912x167271o8e3bac03034fabdd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68fba5c50606261923k16913626gdc95348cc63e5851@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AC3FA569-EADB-4372-B128-66153120A053@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68fba5c50607091843s2e0d3779y319e8cda2d09d3e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <51C57714-762C-48DB-8909-16F9DCB26DBD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <68fba5c50607181643r137efdd4wd84c887942d743c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Robert> On 7/18/06, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >> We don't have rules against such namespace choices.  We could
    >> argue about whether or not we should have such rules,

    Robert> Well, there is a BCP about this.

Do you believe the current draft violates a requirement of that bcp?  What about a recommendation?

References:
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Robert Sayre
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
  - From: Robert Sayre

Prev by Date: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Protocol Action: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread