Re: Pseudo-Last Call on draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-07

[Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>]

My blog <http://www.mnot.net/blog/> has conformant RSS and Atom  
archived feeds.
   <http://www.mnot.net/blog/index.rdf>
  <http://www.mnot.net/blog/index.atom>
I also have a demonstration implementation of a client that will  
reconstruct archived feeds;
  <http://www.mnot.net/rss/history/feed_history.py>

Others? I know paging is used informally a lot in other situations/ 
specs.


On 2006/10/04, at 12:45 PM, James M Snell wrote:

> Are you aware of Atom feeds that are currently implementing this  
> version
> of the draft?  I'd like to do some interop testing.
>
> - James
>
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > I've only had positive comments about -07 so far, so I've  
> > recommended it
> > for publication as a Proposed Standard to the IESG.
> >
> > As part of that process, I'm issuing an informal, pseudo-WG Last  
> > Call on
> > the document to capture any remaining feedback. In particular,
> >
> > * What do people think about putting this document on the  
> > Standards Track?
> >
> > * Do you have an implementation available, in progress, planned,  
> > etc.?
> >
> > http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed- 
> > history/
> >
> > Please provide feedback by October 18th.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/