Re: PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational

To: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>, atom-syntax@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational
From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:37:35 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=d13zXmSwvWhI2F56pIF7AphBlUz8uIxTG2g6PtMOeW8D9S+MZBXr40t7/WHGz8d3XuUD0v+6kl8qJ1hnNM4DGTy0BgJ5NrvAlsG93ONm/kjM2enLXusRwVsg76jXkDs7yFwJiO7gfGJTmS7x8+dg60ZPk8m8NiGWweOo2r28O44=
In-reply-to: <456C65AF.1080609@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <456C65AF.1080609@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx



On 28 Nov 2006, at 16:37, James M Snell wrote:

== Proposal ==

Change the status of the autodiscovery draft to Informational.

+1

There's really no need for it to be a standard, as it's widelyimplemented in a common way.



- Geoffrey Sneddon

References:
- PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational
  - From: James M Snell