[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational


James M Snell wrote:


Lachlan Hunt wrote:

[snip]

Move Autodiscovery forward as an Informational RFC

But if it were published as an informational RFC, what purpose would it
serve?



To document best practice as it relates specifically to syndication
feeds. 

The draft makes several requirements. That's not documenting best practice.


For example, HTML5 says nothing about whether the relative order
of feed autodiscovery links within a document is significant.  The Atom
autodiscovery draft, however, defines that the order is significant.


Which software does that requirement concern?

- Rob