Re: PaceMakeAutodiscoveryInformational

[James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, so given that I think this is the fifth or sixth note in which
you've said exactly the same thing, I think your position has been well
established.  What would be excellent is if you'd give others the
opportunity to weigh in on it before trying so hard to filibuster it.

- James

Robert Sayre wrote:
> Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>>
>> http://www.rssboard.org/news/70/vote-rss-autodiscovery-specification#discuss
>>
> 
> "Like the Atom Autodiscovery draft, this spec serves no purpose.
> Autodiscovery is being defined in the HTML5 spec where it belongs, with
> both the alternate
> <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#alternate0> and feed
> <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#feed0> relationships."
> 
> Fully agree.
> 
> -Rob
> 
>