[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Atom Entry Documents

To: "James M Snell" <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Atom Entry Documents
From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:32:05 -0500
Cc: atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kRfivMtXwZFkeUiXIqk/aRkmnbxyK5XZy+wPHNH0p7CcKOQkhsErHqBbS0+GF/DPqeSt5Efn8HOtiCraECeKVHSEIvyh9IbPzV2QNaL4zJC9xMGFJeGdOJzGj/qnzLpXxlWAjlkpZprwydnu/CsgcWUldXJW5TowIR1D2WbcFt8=
In-reply-to: <457C5DD9.9070309@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <457C5DD9.9070309@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On 12/10/06, James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Option A) Optional Type Param

application/atom+xml; type=entry
application/atom+xml; type=feed

+1 to Optional Type Parameter. The alternative of a new media type for entries is too disruptive and breaks existing implementations based on the current RFC. Such "violence" should not be permitted unless an exceptionally compelling case has been made. No such case has been presented. (In my opinion...)

bob wyman

References:
- Atom Entry Documents
  - From: James M Snell

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: PaceEntryMediatype
Previous by thread: Re: Atom Entry Documents
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread