Re: Atom Entry docs

[Rogers Cadenhead <rcade@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Bob Wyman <bob@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1) Define ;type=feed and ;type=entry as optional
> parameters. (i.e. get them
> defined, registered, and "ready to use.")
> 2) Leave RFC4287 unchanged. i.e. do NOT re-define
> "application/atom-xml"
> 3) New specifications MAY require that ;type=entry
> be used. (Note: Just
> because ;type=entry is used DOES NOT imply that
> ;type=feed must also be
> used....)

+1 on this approach. RFC4287 is a powerful argument in
Atom's favor. Chip away at that spec and we're going
to start hearing from Mr. Safe again.