Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt

[Sam Ruby <rubys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Thanks, Roger. After looking over the links that Randy and others kindly 
> forwarded, consulting with the AD, and hearing nothing from Dave, it 
> looks like we'll go with this link.

Did you check Dave's weblog?  He's recently restored, and is actively 
promoting, an alternate link:

http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/04/30/wikipediaEditing.html

These dueling versions of the RSS 2.0 specification differ in minor 
details (e.g., range of skipHours), major features (permissability 
namespaced attributes on existing RSS elements), and roadmap.

- Sam Ruby