[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt

To: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:05:08 -0700
Cc: "A. Pagaltzis" <pagaltzis@xxxxxx>, atom-syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <595395.14392.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52F5EB38-8A89-4F53-9974-BC1483685C8F@xxxxxxxx> <464B0A97.8040407@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <> <>
Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx


On May 16, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

So if conceivable, include both links (with a caveat lector if
necessary). Is that a possibility?
Yes, and that is a very good suggestion. Let the reader decidewhich they want to believe.


The IESG's gonna *love* that.  -Tim

References:
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
  - From: Rogers Cadenhead
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
  - From: Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
  - From: Sam Ruby
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
  - From: A. Pagaltzis
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
  - From: Paul Hoffman

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
Next by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
Previous by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
Next by thread: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-09.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread