Re: Non-namespaced extension attributes

[Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/10/07 9:30 AM, "James M Snell" <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sam's position (which he can correct if I have misstated anything) is
> that the validator should take a strict approach and mark all unknown,
> non-namespaced attributes as an error unless there is a known
> specification that is specifically updating RFC4287, as is the case with
> the Bidi draft.

It's not an error, but that doesn't mean that the validator couldn't issue a
warning that the attribute is being ignored as foreign markup.

e.