Fw: Paged Feeds Question

["Franklin Tse" <peaceable_whale@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am sorry that I forgot to use "Reply All" in the last mail...

Forwarding Mark's reply back to the mailing list and CC to 
feedvalidator-users.

-Franklin

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, 22 November, 2007 20:16
To: "Franklin Tse" <peaceable_whale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Paged Feeds Question

> Seems reasonable.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 15/11/2007, at 11:46 AM, Franklin Tse wrote:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > While the "self" link is unclear, having the same feed id in a set  of 
> > feed documents seems to be well-agreed. Should the Feed  Validator issue 
> > a notice on that?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Franklin
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2007 06:34
> > To: "Franklin Tse" <peaceable_whale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Atom Syntax" <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: Paged Feeds Question
> >
> > > My recollection of discussions during 5005 was that we had to come  up 
> > > with "current" precisely because "self" was ambiguous. People  may  have 
> > > a reason for advertising the archive document's URI in  "self",  and I 
> > > don't see what the utility of repeating it is.
> > >
> > > YMMV.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/