[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tombstones
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Tombstones
- From: James M Snell <jasnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:08:02 -0800
- Cc: Atom Syntax <atom-syntax@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w2p53/+Jo0t2wAvHk577DdElelb3P31HZV5d16BNKPo=; b=KuSpSJoLLTP2WKn8YmHdW012jFWth4kVMID+gw1dWBNnFvWAguqm+NQxEzyFxzWaJRIl9OoByqN+8zFmbTgeOKWjUN0B4wGdWlB8BYz2YHazebfiFO6H8A9+9m9cYaBy7ZNDEpKQUq48xZt0j7blp7nuPtIGaa+SCrxIrX2EypU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hbCjfLPXDqv7NV0/uVPG2DNXgLUxM4fneIhWK6HGbKOQQmzxtUOMa/9gUCRsW9EcMtzHLi9CsPJO+H5eE6emThn/nE8UNyjgx7xY4ZqDcS0KeWJodxSZyWxqS6DBx0S2n66JNlWT+ca/FSxVVDL0aGE/MdBdlfCtC2+E1Gh1Yk4=
- In-reply-to: <A13E18EF-D699-4A1C-BC68-98EF2726D3E6@xxxxxxxx>
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <atom-syntax.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:atom-syntax-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <A13E18EF-D699-4A1C-BC68-98EF2726D3E6@xxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-atom-syntax@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>
> What's the current state of proposals for and interest in what we called
> tombstones a while back?
>
There really isn't a current status. Msft SSE extensions come the
closest but there are some definite issues that I personally think would
need to be resolved.
What I personally would like to see is an evolved form of SSE produced
on the standards track by a WG. Tombstones would be covered as part of
that activity.
> I'm seeing use cases for managing spam; e.g., if your site accepts
> user-generated-content, and you make a feed of it available, it would be
> nice to be able to be able to have spam control reflected not only on
> the Web page, and in the feed, but also in aggregators' views of the data.
>
We have use cases for offline synchronization, bidirectional sync,
seeding search engines, spam control, more efficient subscription models
(e.g. just give me the changes since the last time I checked), and so
on. After exploring the issue, I strongly believe a single, common
approach would be ideal.
- James
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
>
>