RE: Tombstones

["Brian Smith" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joe Cheng wrote:
> > Now, Steven indicates that their implementation will not 
> > include the tombstone by default. Clients that want
> > tombstones would have to ask for them explicitly.
> 
> This doesn't belong in the implementation, it belongs in the spec.
> (Would this discussion even be taking place if opt-in had 
> been in the spec from the start?) I have advocated HTTP 
> headers for opt-in the past, but to avoid caching problems it 
> seems like a link relation would be better.

What kind of caching problems are you thinking of?

- Brian