Re: Tombstones

[Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 18.12.2007 um 06:57 schrieb James M Snell:
> [...]
> Bottom line: we should avoid over-overloading atom:entry.   
> Regardless of
> the specific solution required, some invention is required and clients
> will have to take specific actions to support tombstones, so we are  
> not
> saving anyone any work by reusing atom:entry for this and we run the
> risk of confusing clients.  The x:deleted tombstone element avoids  
> that
> risk entirely, which for me, makes it the superior solution.

+1

Very good summary.

--
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782